68Ga-NC-BCH Whole-Body PET Imaging Rapidly Targets Claudin18.2 in Lesions in Gastrointestinal Cancer Patients.

68Ga-labeled nanobody (68Ga-NC-BCH) is a single-domain antibody-based PET imaging agent. We conducted a first-in-humans study of 68Ga-NC-BCH for PET to determine its in vivo biodistribution, metabolism, radiation dosimetry, safety, and potential for quantifying claudin-18 isoform 2 (CLDN18.2) expression in gastrointestinal cancer patients. Methods: Initially, we synthesized the probe 68Ga-NC-BCH and performed preclinical evaluations on human gastric adenocarcinoma cell lines and xenograft mouse models. Next, we performed a translational study with a pilot cohort of patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancer on a total-body PET/CT scanner. Radiopharmaceutical biodistribution, radiation dosimetry, and the relationship between tumor uptake and CLDN18.2 expression were evaluated. Results: 68Ga-NC-BCH was stably prepared and demonstrated good radiochemical properties. According to preclinical evaluation,68Ga-NC-BCH exhibited rapid blood clearance, high affinity for CLDN18.2, and high specific uptake in CLDN18.2-positive cells and xenograft mouse models. 68Ga-NC-BCH displayed high uptake in the stomach and kidney and slight uptake in the pancreas. Compared with 18F-FDG, 68Ga-NC-BCH showed significant differences in uptake in lesions with different levels of CLDN18.2 expression. Conclusion: A clear correlation was detected between PET SUV and CLDN18.2 expression, suggesting that 68Ga-NC-BCH PET could be used as a companion diagnostic tool for optimizing treatments that target CLDN18.2 in tumors.

Claudin 18.2 as a novel therapeutic target.

Claudin 18.2, a tight-junction molecule predominantly found in the nonmalignant gastric epithelium, becomes accessible on the tumour cell surface during malignant transformation, thereby providing an appealing target for cancer therapy. Data from two phase III trials testing the anti-claudin 18.2 antibody zolbetuximab have established claudin 18.2-positive advanced-stage gastric cancers as an independent therapeutic subset that derives benefit from the addition of this agent to chemotherapy. This development has substantially increased the percentage of patients eligible for targeted therapy. Furthermore, newer treatments, such as high-affinity monoclonal antibodies, bispecific antibodies, chimeric antigen receptor T cells and antibody-drug conjugates capable of bystander killing effects, have shown considerable promise in patients with claudin 18.2-expressing gastric cancers. This new development has resulted from drug developers moving beyond traditional targets, such as driver gene alterations or growth factors. In this Review, we highlight the biological rationale and explore the clinical activity of therapies that target claudin 18.2 in patients with advanced-stage gastric cancer and explore the potential for expansion of claudin 18.2-targeted therapies to patients with other claudin 18.2-positive solid tumours.

Clinicopathological significance and immunotherapeutic outcome of claudin 18.2 expression in advanced gastric cancer: A retrospective study.

Objective: Immunotherapeutic outcomes and clinical characteristics of claudin 18 isoform 2 positive (CLDN18.2-positive) gastric cancer (GC) vary in different clinical studies, making it difficult to optimize anti-CLDN18.2 therapy. We conducted a retrospective analysis to explore the association of CLDN18.2 expression with clinicopathological characteristics and immunotherapeutic outcomes in GC. Methods: A total of 536 advanced GC patients from 2019 to 2021 in the CT041-CG4006 and CT041-ST-01 clinical trials were included in the analysis. CLDN18.2 expression on ≥40% of tumor cells (2+, 40%) and CLDN18.2 expression on ≥70% of tumor cells (2+, 70%) were considered the two levels of positively expressed GC. The clinicopathological characteristics and immunotherapy outcomes of GC patients were analyzed according to CLDN18.2 expression status. Results: CLDN18.2 was expressed in 57.6% (cut-off: 2+, 40%) and 48.9% (cut-off: 2+, 70%) of patients. Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and CLDN18.2 were co-expressed in 19.8% [combined positive score (CPS)≥1, CLDN18.2 (cut-off: 2+, 40%)] and 17.2% [CPS≥5, CLDN18.2 (cut-off: 2+, 70%)] of patients. CLDN18.2 expression positively correlated with younger age, female sex, non-gastroesophageal junction (non-GEJ), and diffuse phenotype (P<0.001). HER2 and PD-L1 expression were significantly lower in CLDN18.2-positive GC (both P<0.05). Uterine adnexa metastasis (P<0.001) was more frequent and liver metastasis (P<0.001) was less common in CLDN18.2-positive GC. Overall survival and immunotherapy-related progression-free survival (irPFS) were inferior in the CLDN18.2-positive group. Conclusions: CLDN18.2-positive GC is associated with poor prognosis and worse immunotherapeutic outcomes. The combination of anti-CLDN18.2 therapy, anti-PD-L1/PD-1 therapy, and chemotherapy for GC requires further investigation.

Disitamab vedotin (RC48) plus toripalimab for HER2-expressing advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction and other solid tumours: a multicentre, open label, dose escalation and expansion phase 1 trial.

Background: Although the antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have significantly improved the survival outcomes of patients with human epidermal receptor 2 (HER2)-expressing gastric or gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) cancer, the efficacy of ADC used as a single agent is limited. Therefore, it is necessary to investigate effective and safe combination regimens. Preclinical data indicated a synergetic antitumour effect of RC48 and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of RC48 plus toripalimab in patients with HER2-expressing G/GEJ cancer and other solid tumours. Methods: This was a open-label, multicentre, phase 1 trial performed at three hospitals in China. Eligible patients had advanced G/GEJ cancer or other solid tumours with HER2 IHC≥1 or ISH positivity and were refractory to at least one line of treatment, or standard treatment was intolerable or unavailable for these patients. This study followed a "3 + 3" design with predefined RC48 dosages of 2.0 mg/kg and 2.5 mg/kg plus toripalimab 3 mg/kg, once every 2 weeks (q2w). The primary objectives were to evaluate the safety and determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D), and the secondary objectives included assessing the pharmacokinetics (PK) and preliminary efficacy. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04280341. Findings: Between July 13, 2020 and August 30, 2022, 56 patients, including 30 patients with G/GEJ cancer and 26 patients with other solid tumours, were enrolled and received RC48 plus toripalimab (n = 7 for RC48 2.0 mg/kg, toripalimab 3 mg/kg, q2w; n = 49 for RC48 2.5 mg/kg, toripalimab 3 mg/kg, q2w). No dose-limiting toxic effects occurred. The RP2D was declared as RC48 2.5 mg/kg plus toripalimab 3 mg/kg, q2w. The most common grade 3 adverse events were a decreased neutrophil count (n = 13), and a decreased white blood cell count (n = 7). The efficacy assessment was completed for 52 patients. Among patients with G/GEJ cancer (n = 30), the confirmed objective response rate (ORR) was 43% (12/28, 95% CI 25, 63), median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.2 months (95% CI 4.0, 6.9), median overall survival (OS) was 16.8 months (95% CI 7.2, NE). The ORR of patients with G/GEJ cancer receiving RP2D (n = 24) reached 50% (11/22, 95% CI 28, 72), with median PFS of 5.1 months (95% CI 1.4, 7.3) and median OS of 14.0 months (95% CI 6.3, NE). Among patients with G/GEJ cancer who received RP2D, a clinical benefit was observed in both HER2-positive and low HER2 expressing populations, with an ORR of 56% (5/9, 95% CI 21, 86) vs. 46% (6/13, 95% CI 19, 75), median PFS of 7.8 months (95% CI 0.9, NE) vs. 5.1 months (95% CI 1.2, 6.9), median OS of NE months (95% CI 4.3, NE) vs. 14.0 months (95% CI 5.1, NE), respectively. Antitumour activity was also observed for other solid tumours, including breast cancer (5/13) and endometrial carcinoma (1/1). Interpretation: Our findings suggested that RC48 plus toripalimab had a manageable safety profile and showed encouraging efficacy in pretreated patients with HER2-positive and low HER2-expressing G/GEJ cancer. The findings of our phase 1 clinical trial support further investigation of HER2-targeted ADC plus immunotherapy in HER2-expressing G/GEJ cancer and pancancer treatment in the future. Funding: Beijing Municipal Medical Research Institutes, Beijing Medical Research Institute (Z200015).

Pulmonary lymphangitis carcinomatosis: A peculiar presentation clustering in MET-amplified gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: The clinicopathological features of MET-amplified gastric cancer (GC) and real-world data on the efficacy of MET-targeted therapies remain unknown. Pulmonary lymphangitis carcinomatosis (PLC) is a peculiar manifestation of GC, whose management has not been thoroughly described. METHODS: This study analyzed patients diagnosed with MET-amplified GC or GC with PLC at any time point of the disease course from 2011 to 2021 in two centers. Clinicopathological features and survival outcomes of MET-amplified GC were analyzed. The clinical and molecular implications of GC with PLC were discussed. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients with MET-amplified GC and 20 patients with GC accompanied by PLC were finally enrolled for analysis (including 13 overlapped patients). GC with PLC was more common in female patients (p = 0.010), diagnosed at a younger age (p = 0.002), presented with a higher baseline ECOG PS (p = 0.016), and was more likely to develop lung metastasis (p < 0.001), and serous effusion (p = 0.026) than GC without PLC. Patients with primary MET-amplified GC had a worse prognosis than those with secondary MET-amplified GC (p = 0.005). The application of anti-MET therapy was associated with numerically prolonged survival, but the association was not statistically significant (p = 0.07). MET amplification was concentrated in patients with PLC, in which anti-MET therapies elicited a high response rate. CONCLUSIONS: MET-targeted therapies are efficacious in real-world populations with MET-amplified GC. Patients with PLC have distinct clinical and molecular features and might benefit from MET-targeted therapies.

CT041 CAR T cell therapy for Claudin18.2-positive metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Pancreatic cancer lacks effective therapy. Here, we reported two metastatic pancreatic cancer patients administrated with Claudin 18.2 (CLDN 18.2) CART therapy after the failure of standard therapy (NCT04581473 and NCT03874897). In case 1, with CLDN 18.2 expression of 2+, 70%, 250 × 106 cells were infused after lymphodepletion. Grade 1 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) occurred on d1 which was later controlled by tocilizumab. Partial response (PR) was achieved according to RECIST v1.1, with great shrinkage of lung metastasis. An increasing CD8+ T cell and Treg cells and declining CD4+ T cell and B cell were observed. In case 2, IHC result of ClDN18.2 showed 3+, 60%. 250 × 106 CLDN18.2 CART cells were subsequently administered. Patient experienced grade 2 CRS, which was controlled with tocilizumab. Target lesions of lung metastasis further achieved complete response. Similar increasing CD8+ T cell and Treg cell was detected from peripheral blood. Elevating IL-8 and declining TGF-ß1 were also observed. The tumor is still under well control until the last follow-up on July 18, 2023.

First-in-human CLDN18.2 functional diagnostic pet imaging of digestive system neoplasms enables whole-body target mapping and lesion detection.

PURPOSE: Claudin 18.2 (CLDN18.2) is a reliable target for lesion detection and could have clinical implications for epithelial tumors, especially digestive system neoplasms. However, there is no predictive technology for accurate whole-body mapping of CLDN18.2 expression in patients. This study assessed the safety of the 124I-18B10(10L) tracer and the feasibility of mapping whole-body CLDN18.2 expression using PET functional imaging. METHODS: The 124I-18B10(10L) probe was synthesized manually, and preclinical experiments including binding affinity and specific targeting ability were conducted after testing in vitro model cells. Patients with pathologically confirmed digestive system neoplasms were enrolled in an ongoing, open-label, single-arm, first-in-human (FiH) phase 0 trial (NCT04883970). 124I-18B10(10L) PET/CT or PET/MR and 18F-FDG PET were performed within one week. RESULTS: 124I-18B10(10L) was successfully constructed with an over 95% radiochemical yield. The results of preclinical experiments showed that it had high stability in saline and high affinity in CLDN18.2 overexpressing cells (Kd = 4.11 nM). Seventeen patients, including 12 with gastric cancers, 4 with pancreatic cancers, and 1 with cholangiocarcinoma were enrolled. 124I-18B10(10L) displayed high uptake in the spleen and liver, and slight uptake in the bone marrow, lung, stomach and pancreas. The tracer uptake SUVmax in tumor lesions ranged from 0.4 to 19.5. Compared with that in lesions that had been treated with CLDN18.2-targeted therapy, 124I-18B10(10L) uptake was significantly higher in lesions that had not. Regional 124I-18B10(10L) PET/MR in two patients showed high tracer uptake in metastatic lymph nodes. CONCLUSIONS: 124I-18B10(10L) was successfully prepared and exhibited a high binding affinity and CLDN18.2 specificity in preclinical studies. As an FiH CLDN18.2 PET tracer, 124I-18B10(10L) was shown to be safe with acceptable dosimetry and to clearly reveal most lesions overexpressing CLDN18.2. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04883970; URL: https://register. CLINICALTRIALS: gov/ . Registered 07 May 2021.

China special issue on gastrointestinal tumors-NTRK fusion in a large real-world population and clinical utility of circulating tumor DNA genotyping to guide TRK inhibitor treatment.

Neurotrophic tropomyosin receptor kinase (NTRK) gene fusions are rare oncogenic drivers and targets of TRK inhibitors in solid tumors. Little is known about NTRK fusion in Chinese patients with pan-cancer. Our study investigated the prevalence and genomic features of NTRK1/2/3 gene fusions in 67 883 Chinese patients with pan-cancer using next-generation sequencing (NGS) data and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) NGS to guide TRK inhibitor treatment and resistance monitoring. The prevalence of NTRK fusion (tissue NGS) in the pan-cancer population was 0.18%, with 46 unique NTRK-fusion partner pairs, of which 33 were not previously reported. NTRK2 breakpoint occurred more frequently in intron 15 than intron 12. In colorectal cancers (CRCs), compared to NTRK-negative tumors, NTRK-positive tumors displayed higher tumor mutational burden (TMB) levels (54.6 vs 17.7 mut/Mb, P < .0001). In microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) CRC, patients with NTRK fusion had a significantly lower TMB than NTRK-negative cases (69.3 vs 79.9 mut/Mb, P = .012). The frequency of NTRK fusion in a ctDNA NGS cohort of 20 954 patients with cancer was similar to that of the tissue NGS cohort. In eight NTRK fusion ctDNA-positive patients, larotrectinib induced objective response in 75% of patients and median progression-free survival was 16.3 months. Blood samples collected from a patient with disease progression after larotrectinib treatment revealed NTRK3 G623R as the potential resistance mechanism. Our study revealed previously unreported NTRK fusion partners, associations of NTRK fusion with MSI and TMB, and the potential utility of ctDNA to screen candidates for TRK inhibitors and monitor drug resistance.

Serological biomarkers predict immune-related adverse events and clinical benefit in patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancers.

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have dramatically improved survival in advanced gastrointestinal (GI) cancer patients, but also resulted in immune-related adverse events (irAEs). This study aimed to evaluate serological biomarkers of irAEs and treatment response in GI cancer patients. Patients and methods: Metastatic GI cancer patients were enrolled between August 1, 2015, and July 31, 2017. Serum samples were collected at baseline, and a panel of 59 serum biomarkers was tested. The occurrence of irAEs was analyzed, and serological biomarker expression was correlated with irAE incidence and prognosis. Results: Fifty-one patients were enrolled, of whom 47.1% (24/51) were diagnosed with irAEs, including 4 patients (7.8%) with grade 3-5 irAEs. The most common irAE was thyroiditis (9/51, 17.6%), followed by colitis (7/51, 13.7%). The expression of CD28 (P = 0.042), IL-4 (P = 0.033), IL-15 (P = 0.024) and PD-L1 (P = 0.018) was significantly elevated in patients with grade 3-5 irAEs. For organ-specific irAEs, IL-6 levels were higher in patients with thyroiditis and colitis, while IL-22 and SCF levels were higher in patients with colitis. Increased IL-1α, IL-21, LIF, and PIGF-1 levels were significantly associated with myositis incidence, while the serum levels of six cytokines (BTLA, GM-CSF, IL-4, PD-1, PD-L1 and TIM-3) were higher in patients with rash. Prognostic analysis showed that patients with irAEs had better tumor response (P = 0.029), improved PFS (median survival: undefined vs. 2.1 months, P = 0.002), and extended OS (median survival: undefined vs. 4.3 months, P = 0.003). The prognostic value of irAEs was only significant in patients who received anti-PD-1 inhibitors, but not in those who received anti-PD-L1 inhibitors. Besides, elevated BTLA (median OS: not reached vs. 7 months; P = 0.0168) and PD-1 (median OS: not reached vs. 7 months; P = 0.0223) concentrations were associated with longer OS. Conclusions: Serological proteins are promising markers for predicting immune-related toxicity and prognosis in GI cancer patients. Organ-specific irAEs have various cytokine profiles. Although further validation is needed before clinical application, this study provided a direction for identifying patients at risk for irAEs, and guiding patient selection for ICI therapy.

Peripheral Blood Biomarkers Predictive of Efficacy Outcome and Immune-Related Adverse Events in Advanced Gastrointestinal Cancers Treated with Checkpoint Inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal cancers constitute a major burden of global cancer mortalities. In recent years, the advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors has greatly improved the survival of patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancers, while predictive biomarkers of treatment efficacy and toxicities are still unmet demands. METHODS: In our retrospective study, patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancers who received single or double immune checkpoint inhibitors in the Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology in Peking University Cancer Hospital between July 2016 and February 2022 were enrolled. Records of clinicopathological information, survival parameters, safety data, and baseline and posttreatment peripheral blood constituents were retrieved. Cox regression analysis and logistic regression analysis were performed to identify the predictive factors of treatment outcomes and immune-related adverse events. RESULTS: We demonstrated that early treatment lines, the presence of immune-related adverse events, and a lower C2 neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio were independent factors predicting a superior objective response rate and progression-free survival in patients treated with immunotherapy. Lower ECOG PS, higher baseline albumin, and lower C2 neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratios were independent risk factors for the onset of immune-related adverse events. Patients who succumbed to immune-related adverse events during immunotherapy presented better survival. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that peripheral blood markers have potential for predicting treatment outcomes and immune-related adverse events in patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancer. Prospective validations are warranted.

A Phase Ib Study of the Simmitecan Single Agent and in Combination With 5-Fluorouracil/Leucovorin or Thalidomide in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumor.

Background: Simmitecan is a potent inhibitor of topoisomerase I with anti-tumor activity. This phase Ib trial was conducted to investigate the safety and anti-tumor effect of simmitecan alone or in combination with other drugs. Methods: Eligible patients with advanced solid tumor had no further standard treatment options. Patients were allocated to receive simmitecan alone, simmitecan in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (LV), or simmitecan in combination with thalidomide, 14 days a cycle, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred. Results: A total of 41 patients were enrolled, with a median age of 55 (range 29-69) years. Among them, 13 patients received simmitecan monotherapy, 10 received simmitecan + 5-FU/LV, and 18 received simmitecan + thalidomide. No dose-limiting toxicity occurred. Overall, the most common grade 3/4 adverse event (AE) was neutropenia (46.2, 70.0, and 88.9%, respectively, in simmitecan, simmitecan + 5-FU/LV, and simmitecan + thalidomide cohorts), and treatment-related severe AEs included anemia and febrile neutropenia (7.7% each in simmitecan cohort), diarrhea (10% in simmitecan +5-FU/LV cohort), and febrile neutropenia (5.6% in simmitecan + thalidomide cohort). The majority of patients (24/41, 58.3%) had progressed on prior irinotecan; nevertheless, partial response was achieved in one colorectal cancer patients treated with simmitecan + thalidomide. The disease control rates of simmitecan, simmitecan + 5-FU/LV, and simmitecan + thalidomide cohorts were 46.2, 80.0, and 61.1%, respectively. Conclusion: This study demonstrated a manageable safety profile of simmitecan as a single agent or as part of a combination therapy. There have not been any safety concerns with simmitecan in combination when compared to simmitecan alone. Simmitecan + 5-FU/LV regimen seemed to have a better efficacy. Nonetheless, the efficacy of this regimen needs to be further explored in the subsequent study.

Multiplex immunohistochemistry defines the tumor immune microenvironment and immunotherapeutic outcome in CLDN18.2-positive gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: The FAST study identified claudin-18 (CLDN18.2) as a promising novel therapeutic target for gastric cancer (GC). However, the tumor immune microenvironment and clinicopathological features of CLDN18.2-positive GC are unclear, making it difficult to develop and optimize CLDN18.2-targeted treatments. METHODS: This study included 80 GC patients, 60 of whom received anti-PD-1/PD-L1 treatment. CD4/CD8/CD20/CD66b/CD68/CD163/PD-1/PD-L1/TIM-3/LAG-3/FoxP3/CTLA-4/HLA-DR/STING, and CLDN18.2 were labeled using multiplex immunohistochemistry (m-IHC) to decipher the rate and spatial distribution of T cells, B cells, macrophages, and neutrophils in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor tissues isolated from these patients. Tumor immune-microenvironmental features and patient survival stratified by CLDN18.2 expression were analyzed using two independent-sample t-tests and log-rank tests, respectively. RESULTS: We considered moderate-to-strong CLDN18.2 expression ≥ 40% of tumor cells as the cut-off for positivity. The proportion of CD8+PD-1-, CD8+LAG-3-, and CD8+TIM-3- T cells was significantly higher in CLDN18.2-positive tumors than in negative tumors (0.039 vs. 0.026, P = 0.009; 0.050 vs.0.035, P = 0.024; 0.045 vs. 0.032, P = 0.038, respectively). In addition, the number of neutrophils (CD66b+) was higher in the CLDN18.2-positive group than in the negative group (0.081 vs. 0.055, P = 0.031, respectively), while the rates of M1 (CD68+CD163-HLA-DR+), M2 macrophages (CD68+CD163+HLA-DR-), and B cells (CD20+) were comparable between the CLDN18.2-positive and negative groups. The average numbers of CD8+PD-1-, CD8+LAG-3-, and CD8+TIM-3-T cells surrounding tumor cells within a 20-µm range were higher in CLDN18.2-positive tumors than in the CLDN18.2-negative tumors (0.16 vs. 0.09, P = 0.011; 0.20 vs. 0.12, P = 0.029; 0.18 vs. 0.12, P = 0.047, respectively). In addition, in the CLDN18.2-positive group, tumor cells surrounded by CD8+PD-1-, CD8+LAG-3- T cells, or M1 macrophages within a 20-µm range accounted for a higher proportion of all tumor cells than those in the CLDN18.2-negative group (10.79% vs. 6.60%, P = 0.015; 12.68% vs. 8.70%, P = 0.049; 9.08% vs. 6.56%, P = 0.033, respectively). These findings suggest that CLDN18.2-positive GC harbors complex immune-microenvironmental features. Additionally, CLDN18.2-positive group had shorter OS and irOS than CLDN18.2-negative group (median OS: 23.33 vs.36.6 months, P < 0.001; median irOS: 10.03 vs. 20.13 months, P = 0.044, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: CLDN18.2-positive GC displayed unique immune-microenvironmental characteristics, which is of great significance for the development of CLDN18.2-targeted therapies. However, the impact of CLDN18.2-related microenvironmental features on prognosis requires further investigation.

Molecular mechanisms underlying the resistance of BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer to EGFR/BRAF inhibitors.

Background: Combinatorial inhibition of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and BRAF shows remarkable clinical benefits in patients with BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, the tumor may inevitably develop resistance to the targeted therapy, thereby limiting the response rate and durability. This study aimed to determine the genetic alterations associated with intrinsic and acquired resistance to EGFR/BRAF inhibitors in BRAF V600E-mutant mCRC. Methods: Targeted sequencing of 520 cancer-related genes was performed in tumor tissues and in plasma samples collected from patients with BRAF V600E-mutant mCRC, who were treated with EGFR/BRAF ±â€„MEK inhibitors, before and after the targeted treatment. Clinical benefit was defined as an objective response or a stable disease lasting longer than the median progression-free survival (PFS). Results: In all, 25 patients with BRAF V600E-mutant mCRC were included in this study. Those with RNF43 mutations (n = 8) were more likely to achieve clinical benefit from EGFR/BRAF inhibitors than those with wild-type RNF43 (87.5% versus 37.5%, p = 0.034). Genetic alterations in receptor tyrosine kinase genes (n = 6) were associated with worse PFS (p = 0.005). Among the 23 patients whose disease progressed after the EGFR/BRAF-targeted therapy, at least one acquired resistance-related mutation was detected in 12 patients. Acquired mutations were most frequently observed in the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway-related genes (n = 9), including KRAS (G12D and Q61H/R), NRAS (Q61L/R/K and amplification), BRAF (amplification), and MEK1 (K57T). MET amplification and PIK3R1 Q579fs mutation emerged in three patients and one patient, respectively, after disease progression. Conclusion: Multiple genetic alterations are associated with clinical benefits and resistance to EGFR/BRAF inhibitors in BRAF V600E-mutant mCRC. Our findings provide novel insights into strategies for overcoming resistance to EGFR/BRAF inhibitors in patients with BRAF V600E-mutant mCRC.

Combination of AKT1 and CDH1 mutations predicts primary resistance to immunotherapy in dMMR/MSI-H gastrointestinal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal (GI) cancer is the second most common cancer type with mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR)/microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) phenotype that is expected to respond to immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, approximately half of the patients with dMMR/MSI-H GI cancer derive no benefit from ICIs. We sought to identify the predictors of primary resistance to ICIs in dMMR/MSI-H GI cancer. METHODS: Three independent cohorts were included: (1) the discovery cohort (65 patients with dMMR/MSI-H GI cancer) with ICI efficacy data and pre-ICIs tissue samples for genomic profile and tumor immune infiltration; (2) the validation cohort (22 patients with dMMR/MSI-H GI cancer) with ICI efficacy data and pre-ICIs plasma samples for genomic profile; and (3) the TCGA (The Cancer Genome Atlas) cohort not receiving ICIs (152 patients with MSI-H GI cancer) with genomic profile and survival data. RESULTS: AKT1 and CDH1 mutations were identified as independent predictors of poor progression-free survival (PFS) and primary resistance to ICIs in dMMR/MSI-H GI cancer. We combined these two genes as an immuno-oncology therapy predictor (IOpred), which could recognize 52.4% (11/21) of dMMR/MSI-H patients with primary resistance to ICIs with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 91.7% (11/12). Receiver operating characteristic analysis demonstrated IOpred with a good performance in predicting primary resistance (area under the curve 0.751). Patients with IOpred-Mut (mutant AKT1 or CDH1) GI cancer had significantly shorter PFS (HR=8.36, p<0.001) and overall survival (OS, HR=5.17, p<0.001) than IOpred-WT (wild-type for both AKT1 and CDH1) cases upon ICI treatment. The validation cohort also confirmed the correlation between IOpred-mutation and poorer prognosis (PFS, HR=4.68, p=0.004; OS, HR=15.98, p<0.001) in dMMR/MSI-H patients after ICIs. The PPV of IOpred in identifying primary resistance to ICIs was 80% (4/5) in the validation cohort. Additionally, IOpred-WT patients could be further stratified by tumor mutational burden (TMB), wherein TMB-low patients (TMB ≤26.19 mutations per megabase (Mb)) had a significantly higher primary resistance rate to ICIs (34.8% vs 6.7%, p=0.014) and poorer PFS (HR=3.46, p=0.008) and OS (HR=4.42, p=0.047) than TMB-high patients (TMB >26.19 mutations/Mb). CONCLUSIONS: IOpred was identified as a powerful predictor of primary resistance to ICIs in dMMR/MSI-H GI cancer, which might serve as a promising biomarker to help guide immunotherapy decision-making.

Claudin18.2-specific CAR T cells in gastrointestinal cancers: phase 1 trial interim results.

Despite success in hematologic malignancies, the treatment landscape of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy for solid tumors remains limited. Claudin18.2 (CLDN18.2)-redirected CAR T cells showed promising efficacy against gastric cancer (GC) in a preclinical study. Here we report the interim analysis results of an ongoing, open-label, single-arm, phase 1 clinical trial of CLDN18.2-targeted CAR T cells (CT041) in patients with previously treated, CLDN18.2-positive digestive system cancers ( NCT03874897 ). The primary objective was safety after CT041 infusion; secondary objectives included CT041 efficacy, pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity. We treated 37 patients with one of three CT041 doses: 2.5 × 108, 3.75 × 108 or 5.0 × 108 cells. All patients experienced a grade 3 or higher hematologic toxicity. Grade 1 or 2 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) occurred in 94.6% of patients. No grade 3 or higher CRS or neurotoxicities, treatment-related deaths or dose-limiting toxicities were reported. The overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) reached 48.6% and 73.0%, respectively. The 6-month duration of response rate was 44.8%. In patients with GC, the ORR and DCR reached 57.1% and 75.0%, respectively, and the 6-month overall survival rate was 81.2%. These initial results suggest that CT041 has promising efficacy with an acceptable safety profile in patients with heavily pretreated, CLDN18.2-positive digestive system cancers, particularly in those with GC.

Evaluation of Event-Free Survival Surrogating Overall Survival as the Endpoint in Neoadjuvant Clinical Trials of Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma.

Background: Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most common malignant cancers worldwide. The development of potential antitumor agents is being investigated and stimulates more clinical trials. Overall survival (OS) is consistently considered the primary endpoint for clinical trials on treatment effect assessment. However, finding an appropriate endpoint more sensitive and easy for trials is vital. For adjuvant chemotherapy, current evidence has shown that disease-free survival (DFS) could be a surrogate endpoint for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with GC, but evidence for neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) or chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) is inadequate. This study was designed to evaluate the possibility that event-free survival (EFS) surrogates OS in RCTs of NCT/NCRT of gastric orss gastroesophageal (GC or GEJ) adenocarcinoma patients (ADK). Methods: A literature search was conducted through databases including PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase. References and articles from other sources were also included. A total of 8 RCTs with 2,837 patients were eventually analyzed. Hazard ratios (HRs) of OS and EFS were directly approached. The surrogacy of EFS was assessed through the correlation of determination R2. We used Review Manage pooling HRs of OS and EFS at the trial level. I2 was used to demonstrate the heterogeneity of inclusions. Publication bias was summarized and illustrated through funnel plots. All analyses were on two sides with a setting statistical significance as p < 0.05. Results: Eight RCTs of 2,837 patients were analyzed at the trial level. The I2 for OS was 21% and 51% for EFS, and a fixed-effect model was used. The pooled HR of OS was 0.83 (95% CI: 0.75-0.92, p < 0.001), and that of EFS was 0.78 (95% CI: 0.71-0.86, p < 0.001). The regression correlation coefficient between EFS and OS was 0.76 (95% CI: 0.41-1.11, p = 0.002), and the coefficient of determination R2 = 0.826. Conclusions: A strong correlation was observed between OS and EFS at the trial level. EFS could be a surrogate endpoint for neoadjuvant RCTs of GC and GEJ adenocarcinoma. Further studies and evidence from individual data are expected.

Efficacy and Safety Comparison of Regorafenib and Fruquintinib in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer-An Observational Cohort Study in the Real World.

BACKGROUND: Regorafenib and fruquintinib are tyrosine kinase inhibitors that are recommended for refractory colorectal cancer (CRC) in China. However, to date, no head-to-head trials have been conducted to guide clinical practice. METHODS AND PATIENTS: An ambispective observational cohort study was conducted in Beijing Cancer Hospital. Patients with metastatic CRC who received regorafenib or fruquintinib were retrospectively collected between January 2018 and April 2020, and prospectively enrolled between May 2020 and February 2021. The primary outcome was time-to-treatment failure (TTF), and secondary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and adverse events. An additional goal of the study was to explore the appropriate sequence of regorafenib and fruquintinib treatment. RESULTS: A total of 366 patients with metastatic CRC were enrolled to receive regorafenib (n = 260) or fruquintinib (n = 106) between January 2018 and February 2021. No difference was observed for median TTF (regorafenib 2.7 months vs. fruquintinib 3.1 months, P = .200) or median OS (regorafenib 13.8 months vs. fruquintinib 11.3 months, P = .527). The propensity score analysis showed similar results for median TTF and median OS between the 2 groups, as did the results of subgroup analysis for prospective set (n = 146). For sequence analysis, patients with regorafenib followed by fruquintinib (n = 84) showed longer OS than that with the reverse (n = 29) (28.1 months vs. 18.4 months, P = .024). Most patients tolerated regorafenib at a reduced dose (93.1%), and most patients tolerated fruquintinib at a standard dose (68.9%). The incidences of most adverse events were similar between the two groups, while any grade of hand-foot skin reaction and hyperbilirubinemia were more frequently observed in the regorafenib group and ≥grade 3 hypertension was more common in the fruquintinib group. CONCLUSION: Regorafenib and fruquintinib had similar efficacy and toxicity profiles with various frequency. Regorafenib followed by fruquintinib showed longer OS than the reverse, but the sequence needs to be further confirmed.

Response to the rechallenge of combination immunotherapy in a patient with late-stage gastric cancer: case report.

Until present, late-stage gastric cancer (GC) remains a refractory disease featured with poor prognosis. However, the upcoming era of immunotherapy turns situations around. Programmed death-1 receptor (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) signaling blockade, an option of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI), has gained approval for the third-line treatment of patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic GC. Despite its efficacy in a few tumor subtypes, most patients are insensitive to anti-PD-1 monotherapy. Therefore, growing interests arise in combination immunotherapy. To explore the maximal potentials of ICI, oncologists also focus on ICI rechallenge. Here we present a patient with unresected stage IV, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) unrelated, microsatellite stable and HER2 heterogeneously expressed gastric adenocarcinoma who experienced the failures of previous immunotherapy. He was then rechallenged with identical ICI regime combined with tyrosine kinase inhibiting and anti-HER2 therapy. The patient responded and tolerated well to this regimen and survived with fair living quality after 28 months of treatment. This case suggests that patients who fail frontline immunotherapy still possibly benefit from rechallenge of the same anti-PD-1 regimen. Besides, combination of ICI and other target agents might intrigue a synergistic effect, resulting in enhanced anti-tumor effect, which provides a meaningful therapeutic strategy. Relevant studies are underway of investigation and might be a hotspot for future research.

PTCH1 mutation promotes antitumor immunity and the response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in colorectal cancer patients.

Immunotherapy has emerged as an effective therapeutic strategy for various cancers, including colorectal cancer (CRC), but only a subset of MSI-H patients can benefit from such therapy. Patched1 (PTCH1) is a frequently altered gene in CRCs and its mutations contribute to unregulated Hedgehog (Hh) signaling. In the study, we evaluated the association of PTCH1 mutations with CRC immunity based on our single-center cohort and multiple cancer genomic datasets. Among 21 enrolled patients, six (28.6%) harbored a PTCH1 mutation based on WES analyses. In CRC patients, the PTCH1 mutation subgroup experienced a higher durable clinical benefit rate than the PTCH1 wild-type subgroup (100% vs. 40%, P = 0.017). In addition, patients with the PTCH1 mutation experienced greater progression-free survival (PFS, P = 0.037; HR, 0.208) and overall survival (OS, P = 0.045; HR, 0.185). A validation cohort from the MSKCC also confirmed the correlation between PTCH1 mutation and better prognosis (P = 0.022; HR, 0.290). Mechanically, diverse antitumor immune signatures were more highly enriched in PTCH1-mutated tumors than in PTCH1 wild-type tumors. Furthermore, PTCH1-mutated tumors had higher proportions of CD8 + T cells, activated NK cells, and M1 type macrophage infiltration, as well as elevated gene signatures of several steps in the cancer-immunity cycle. Notably, the PTCH1 mutation was correlated with tumor mutational burden (TMB), loss of heterozygosity score, and copy number variation burden. Our results show that the mutation of PTCH1 is a potential biomarker for predicting the response of CRC patients to immunotherapy.